Connect with us

Editorial Opinion

Nigeria’s New National Anthem: President’s Clarion Call for Unity and Cooperation Towards a Prosperous Nigeria



Nigeria’s president has taken a controversial step by signing a bill into law that changes the national anthem, a move that has generates alot of controversy with many Nigerians slamming the president’s decision amid the economic hardship in nigeria.

The “new” anthem is a retroversion to the version used from 1960 to 1978, a period marked by national unity and a sense of purpose. This change has raised questions about the president’s motives, the role of government in shaping national identity, and the ability of a change in anthem to address the country’s pressing problems.

Read also Opinion: How The Minister Could Have Strategize to Cut Electricity Waste and Budget, Not Hike Tariffs

The old national anthem, “Nigeria We Hail Thee,” was composed by two British women, Lilian Jean Williams and Frances Berda, while “Arise, O Compatriots” was created by five Nigerian police band members. The latter has been sung and celebrated globally for nearly five decades, becoming an integral part of Nigerian identity. The swift passage of the bill through parliament, within just a week, has fueled suspicions of a hidden agenda.

Ruling party supporters argue that the old anthem helped shape national identity and unity, evoking feelings of nostalgia and fond memories of the country’s early years. However, many Nigerians are upset and skeptical, seeing the sudden change as a desperate attempt to distract from the country’s failures. They argue that the government should focus on addressing pressing issues like corruption, poverty, and political instability battling the country rather than changing the anthem.

Why Was The National Anthem Changed? despite many Nigerians making mockery of the national anthem President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s decision comes at a time when Nigeria is grappling with ethnic, religious, and tribal tensions, which have polarized the nation and hindered its progress. The country is almost divided, with different groups pitted against each other, and politicians prioritizing tribe and ethnicity over good governance and the nation’s well-being. As part of the national anthem lyrics “Though tribes and tongues may differ
In brotherhood we stand,
Nigerians all, are proud to serve
Our sovereign Motherland”it’s of significance important that the president is calling for unity, cooperation and peace among different tribe and ethnic group, government officials both in local and national level in Nigeria which is needed for the progress of the country.

New National Anthem

The debate over the national anthem serves as a reminder of the need for a more profound and inclusive approach to nation-building. Nigeria needs a comprehensive approach that addresses the underlying issues, promotes national unity, and fosters a sense of purpose. The government must engage in dialogue with citizens, address the pressing problems, and demonstrate its commitment to the nation’s progress.

In conclusion, the change in national anthem has sparked a national conversation about identity, unity, and the role of government in shaping the nation’s destiny. While some see the move as a positive step towards reconciliation and healing, others view it as a cosmetic change that fails to address the underlying issues. Nigeria needs a more profound approach to nation-building, one that prioritizes national unity, good governance, and the well-being of all citizens.

Read also Opinion: Can The Returning Of Fuel Subsidy Returns Nigeria’s Economy Back To Its Previous Level? Lets Discuss It

Nigeria, we hail thee
Our own dear native land
Though tribes and tongues may differ
In brotherhood we stand
Nigerians all, proud to serve
Our sovereign motherland
Our flag shall be a symbol
Of freedom and of might
In peace and unity we’ll stand
To build a nation great and strong
And ever loyal we shall be
To our dear native land
Nigeria, we hail thee.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Editorial Opinion

Opinion: How The Minister Could Have Strategize to Cut Electricity Waste and Budget, Not Hike Tariffs




Union Cries Over Electricity Tariff Increase, Pleads for Reversal

Adebayo Adelabu, the Minister of Power, has outlined that the recent hike in electricity tariffs is a step-by-step approach towards phasing out subsidies in the power sector.

The government aims to encourage greater investment, establish tariffs that reflect the true costs for consumers, bolster the financial health of the sector, and ultimately enhance the reliability of electricity provision.

The minister argued that the government had to increase electricity prices because the existing subsidies were becoming too expensive to maintain. He noted that the subsidies were taking up an increasing share of the national budget, and that this money could be better spent on other public services.

At the same time, he acknowledged that the price increase would have an impact on consumers, but he stressed that it was a necessary step to ensure the long-term viability of the power sector.

He also mentioned that many people waste electricity even when it’s not serving any useful purpose. For example, they may leave appliances on when they’re not using them, or they may overuse appliances that aren’t necessary.

How could the minister of power solve these problems, reduce the budget without hiking electricity tariffs?

One possible solution would be to implement a system of incentives and penalties to encourage more responsible use of electricity by consumers. For example, the government could offer rebates or discounts for those who reduce their consumption during peak hours, or penalties for those who use excessive amounts of electricity.

This could be coupled with public education campaigns to raise awareness of the importance of responsible electricity use.

Moreover, the government could invest in technologies and infrastructure that allow for more efficient use of electricity, such as smart meters and more efficient appliances. This would help to reduce overall consumption without the need for price increases.

Continue Reading

Editorial Opinion

Opinion: Can The Returning Of Fuel Subsidy Returns Nigeria’s Economy Back To Its Previous Level? Lets Discuss It




The Impact of President Tinubu's Fuel Subsidy Removal on Nigeria's Economy

When President Bola Ahmed Tinubu took office in May 2023, he announced that the fuel subsidy would be removed. This decision had an immediate impact on oil companies in Nigeria, which began increasing the price of petroleum. This move sparked controversy and concern among Nigerians, who were worried about its effect on the economy.

President Tinubu addressed the nation in a series of press conferences, explaining that while the fuel subsidy had been intended to help the oil and petroleum industries, it had been exploited by corrupt officials.

He argued that removing the subsidy would allow the government to direct funds to other sectors, such as infrastructure, healthcare, and education.

President Tinubu’s decision to remove the fuel subsidy was highly controversial, and he faced significant criticism from both citizens and opposition parties.

Many people expressed their frustration and concern over the potential impact of this decision on the cost of living and the wider economy. Some argued that the move would disproportionately affect the poor and vulnerable.

Despite the criticism, President Tinubu stood by his decision and argued that the funds previously spent on the fuel subsidy could be better used to invest in infrastructure, healthcare, and education.

He said that while the short-term impact of removing the subsidy might be difficult for some people, in the long run it would lead to economic growth and benefit the country as a whole.

The decision to remove the fuel subsidy has had serious economic consequences for Nigeria, leading to increased costs for many basic goods and services. Food prices have risen by over 100%, cement has become more expensive, and the cost of cooking gas has increased.

This has led to a number of negative effects, including a rise in tuition fees at Nigerian institutions, the departure of businesses from the country, and a decrease in the value of the naira. Many citizens have become increasingly frustrated by the economic difficulties they are facing as a result of these changes.

The situation has also led to an increase in unemployment, as businesses struggle to stay afloat and individuals face rising costs. Inflation has become a significant problem, and the Nigerian economy is facing a serious crisis.

In addition, the removal of the fuel subsidy has led to a shortage of gasoline, making it difficult for people to travel and conduct their daily activities.

The removal of the fuel subsidy has also had an impact on security in Nigeria. With the increased cost of living and decreased access to basic goods and services, many people have turned to crime in order to survive.

Banditry, theft, and other forms of crime have increased, and the country is facing a serious security crisis as a result.

The increase in kidnapping and other violent crimes is a particularly concerning consequence of the economic instability caused by the removal of the fuel subsidy. Kidnapping has become a major problem in Nigeria, with criminal gangs targeting individuals, businesses, and even schools.

This has not only led to financial losses and trauma for victims and their families, but has also had a devastating effect on the country’s education system.

The question now is: even if the fuel subsidy is returned, can it return Nigeria to its previous level?

  • Can the price of foods and commodities go down?
  • Can Tution Fees Goes Back To It’s Normal Level?
  • Will the dollar-to-naira exchange rate go back to its previous rate?
  • Can the foreign and local companies that have stopped operations because of bankruptcy be active again?

The Answer Is Even If It Will Happen, It Will Takes Years

It’s true that the economic damage caused by the removal of the fuel subsidy will likely take years to fully repair, even if the subsidy is reinstated. This is because it takes time for prices to adjust, businesses to recover, and the foreign exchange market to stabilize.

The saying “It may take just a day to destroy a house, but it can take many years to build it back” is a good reminder that economic recovery is a long-term process.


Continue Reading